S-STEM Grant Faculty Professional Development

Universal Design for Learning (UDL) 3.0 for Upper‑Level STEM Teaching

The S-STEM Grant Faculty Professional Development is part of the BELONG in STEM program, a five-year initiative funded by a $2 million NSF grant. This program provides merit scholarships and academic support to high-achieving, low-income STEM students. Recognizing that STEM faculty are often hired for their subject-matter expertise rather than their teaching skills, the Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning (CITL) offers compensated, grant-funded ongoing faculty professional development to the program. This initiative aims to support inclusive and effective STEM teaching by leveraging CITL's existing teaching support.

CITL's pedagogical specialists and teaching development experts collaborate with upper-level STEM faculty to create learning environments where all students can access rigorous content, overcome challenges, and succeed. Using the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) 3.0 framework, the program offers a cohesive three‑workshop series and ongoing course redesign support focused on removing barriers to access, sustaining motivation and mastery, and building students’ strategic and self‑directed learning skills. Through a multi‑year cohort model, faculty collaborate to strengthen inclusive, high‑impact STEM teaching that supports student success both in the classroom and beyond.

Overview

In support of the S‑STEM grant’s goals of advancing equity, persistence, and academic success among upper-level STEM students, this professional development initiative offers a structured, multi‑year faculty learning program grounded in the Universal Design for Learning (UDL) 3.0 framework.

The program supports faculty who teach upper division undergraduate STEM courses in designing learning environments that expand access to rigorous STEM content, strengthen students’ sense of belonging, and cultivate long‑term strategic learning skills—without diluting academic standards.

Program Description

The S‑STEM Faculty Professional Development program consists of a three-workshop sequence, supported by course redesign time, instructional design consultation and a faculty learning community.

Across the series, faculty learn strategies for:

  • ACCESS – Reducing structural and cognitive barriers to entry and early engagement
  • SUPPORT – Sustaining effort, mastery and persistence through challenging content
  • EXECUTIVE FUNCTION – Building strategic, reflective and self‑directed learners

The workshops are designed for faculty teaching upper‑level undergraduate STEM students, many of whom balance coursework with employment, caregiving, financial pressure and variable prior preparation.

Program Goals

The S‑STEM Faculty Professional Development initiative aims to:

  • Increase faculty capacity to teach upper‑level undergraduate STEM courses using UDL 3.0 principles
  • Improve access to rigorous content while maintaining high academic standards
  • Enhance students’ sense of belonging and academic confidence in STEM
  • Support persistence, motivation and mastery in demanding STEM coursework
  • Build students’ executive function, metacognitive awareness and strategic learning skills
  • Generate scalable, evidence‑informed teaching practices that can be shared across STEM departments

Workshop Series

Learn more about each of the faculty workshops.

Focus

Early‑semester course decisions that shape clarity, belonging, and cognitive access.

Key Topics

  • Clear expectations and reduced extraneous cognitive load
  • Multimodal materials (text, visuals, guided notes, captions)
  • Clarifying assumed background knowledge
  • Inclusive cues that signal belonging and normalize learning curves

Outcome

Students encounter fewer invisible barriers and experience early success and clarity.

Title and Description

Making the First Weeks Count: STEM Course Design for Clarity, Access and Belonging

This session supports faculty in making intentional early semester course design decisions that foster belonging, clarity and cognitive access. Faculty explore practical strategies to clarify expectations, reduce unnecessary cognitive load, and present content in multiple formats (such as text, visuals, guided notes, and captions). The workshop emphasizes designing courses that welcome diverse student identities, make explicit expectations for background knowledge, and offer flexible pathways for engagement and participation. The focus is on equipping faculty with evidence-based approaches that proactively address common barriers and support early success in upper‑level STEM courses.

Objectives

  1. Participants will recognize the importance of acknowledging socio-demographic disparities in STEM fields and will learn strategies to highlight diverse scientists and innovators, fostering an inclusive learning environment.
  2. Participants will explore methods to make instructional content accessible across various formats (text, visuals, video) and will understand the importance of providing resources such as multilingual glossaries and guided notes to support diverse learning needs.
  3. Participants will create opportunities for flexible interaction by offering multiple assignment submission formats and synchronous and asynchronous participation options to engage all students effectively.

Focus

Supporting student motivation, conceptual understanding, and persistence through complex STEM material.

Key Topics

  • Transparent goals, criteria, and assessment pathways
  • Scaffolding and milestone‑based assignments
  • Explicit instruction in discipline‑specific language, symbols and notation
  • Worked examples and structured feedback loops

Outcome

Students experience clearer pathways to mastery and sustained engagement.

Title and Description

Keeping Students Engaged When It Gets Hard: Instructional Design for STEM Persistence

Building on early‑semester access, this second session supports faculty in sustaining student motivation, deepening conceptual understanding and promoting persistence through challenging STEM content. Faculty explore ways to set clear goals, connect course material to real‑world relevance, and structure assignments with meaningful milestones. The workshop highlights instructional strategies such as clarifying discipline‑specific language, using worked examples to model expert thinking and offering multimodal options for demonstrating learning. The focus is on equipping faculty with tools to reduce symbolic overload and foster engagement through transparent criteria, structured learning pathways and growth‑oriented feedback.

Objectives

  1. Participants will explicitly clarify course goals and assessment criteria while connecting STEM concepts to real-world applications.
  2. Participants will develop strategies to make language and symbols more transparent for students, including the use of concept maps, modeling translations between symbolic and plain language, and incorporating visual aids to explain complex concepts.
  3. Participants will explore ways to scaffold multimodal assessments, allowing students to express their understanding through various formats, and implement mastery-oriented feedback practices focused on growth, including structured problem-solving templates and revision opportunities.

Focus

Explicitly teaching planning, reflection, and self‑regulation skills essential for STEM success.

Key Topics

  • Metacognitive reflection and exam wrappers
  • Structured problem‑solving frameworks
  • Time‑planning strategies for students balancing work and coursework
  • Coping strategies and stress navigation

Outcome

Students develop transferable learning strategies that extend beyond a single course.

Title and Description

Teaching Strategic Learning: Building Self‑Directed STEM Learners

This session assists faculty in teaching that goes beyond removing barriers to actively building students’ executive function skills, such as planning, reflection, and self-regulation. Drawing on S-STEM program data shows that the majority of S-STEM scholars, and generally upper-level STEM students, juggle coursework with work and family duties. Instructors are encouraged to consider how time, stress, and cognitive resources impact their classrooms. The workshop explores strategies for teaching planning and problem-solving, embedding metacognitive reflection, and designing courses that account for real-world challenges, ultimately helping upper-level STEM students become strategic, resilient, and self-directed learners.

Objectives

  1. Participants will develop strategies to foster emotional and metacognitive awareness in students by incorporating reflective prompts, normalizing struggle in STEM learning, and integrating “pause and process” moments during lectures.
  2. Participants will use structured connections to build knowledge by activating prior knowledge through intentional prompts, employing concept maps to visualize relationships, and using cumulative review tools.
  3. Participants will explore ways to teach students planning and study strategies by providing weekly templates, guidance on efficient studying habits, and structured frameworks for problem-solving and time management.

Eligibility

Eligible participants include faculty and instructional staff who teach upper‑division undergraduate STEM courses, including:

  • Tenured and tenure‑track faculty
  • Instructional and clinical faculty
  • Faculty across participating STEM departments and interdisciplinary programs

Priority is Given to Faculty Who

  • Teach courses enrolling significant numbers of S‑STEM scholars
  • Regularly teach the same upper‑level undergraduate STEM courses
  • Teach high impact or required upper-level undergraduate STEM courses
  • Are willing to participate in assessment and reflection activities related to the professional development

Cohort Model and Timeline

The program runs across four cohorts (2026–2030), with each cohort following a repeating cycle.

Cohort 1 (Pilot)

  • Recruitment: April-May 2026
  • Faculty Training: June 10-12, 2026
  • Implementation: Fall 2026
  • Reflection and Recruitment: Spring 2027

Cohorts 2-4

  • Recruitment: Spring
  • Training: Summer
  • Implementation: Fall
  • Reflection and Recuitment: Following Spring

Each cohort benefits from lessons learned and refinements from previous cohorts.

Program Structure

 
 
 
 
 

Summer

Faculty Training and Course Redesign

  • Three sequential workshops (ACCESS → SUPPORT → EXECUTIVE FUNCTION)
  • Dedicated course redesign time
  • Instructional design support
  • Peer consultation and collaboration
 
 
 
 
 

Fall

Course Implementation

  • Faculty implement redesigned courses
  • Ongoing learning community check‑ins
  • Troubleshooting and formative student feedback
 
 
 
 
 

Spring

Reflection and Knowledge Sharing

  • Faculty reflection and artifact collection
  • Panel discussions and showcases
  • Documentation of effective practices to inform future cohorts

Assessment and Impact

Assessment focuses on:

  • Faculty reflections on course redesign and implementation
  • Student feedback and learning artifacts (as appropriate by cohort)
  • Identification of practices that increase access, persistence, and clarity in upper‑level STEM courses
  • Continuous improvement of the professional development design

Cohort 1 serves as a pilot, with more limited data collection focused on the professional development experience itself.

Participation Expectations

Faculty participants are expected to:

  • Attend all three workshops during the training summer
  • Redesign at least one upper‑level STEM course using UDL principles
  • Implement redesigned elements during the academic year
  • Participate in learning community check‑ins
  • Share insights, reflections, or examples with the broader STEM faculty community

Program Outcomes and Sustainability

Through multiple cohorts, the program will:

  • Build a cross departmental STEM faculty learning community
  • Produce shareable teaching resources (rubrics, assignment examples, workshop materials)
  • Strengthen institutional capacity for inclusive, high rigor STEM teaching
  • Conclude with documented lessons learned at the end of the S‑STEM grant period

Learn More

For more information or to express interest in participating in an upcoming faculty development cohort, contact Amanda Hirsch or Linh Nguyen.

Contact Us

Center for Innovative
Teaching and Learning

Phone: 815-753-0595
Email: citl@niu.edu