| Original Policy Source | Division of Research and Innovation Partnerships |
| Policy Approval Authority | President |
| Responsible Division | Division of Research and Innovation Partnerships |
| Responsible University Office | Office of Research Compliance, Integrity, and Safety |
| Responsible Officer(s) | Vice President for Research and Innovation Partnerships |
| Contact Person | Patricia Wallace |
| Primary Audience |
Faculty
Staff Student |
| Status | Active |
| Last Review Date | 06-17-2022 |
| Policy Category/Categories |
Faculty & Academics
Research Ethics / Intellectual Property |
Before a participant becomes involved in research, investigators must obtain either the legally informed consent of the participant (or the participant’s legally authorized representative) or have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for a waiver of informed consent. Although this policy largely addresses the content required for informed consent, consent for participation is a process which may involve providing participants with additional information as necessary and ensuring continuing participant’s consent throughout the course of the study. In some cases, the investigator may need to proactively verify that the participant understands the consent materials.
An individual or judicial or other body authorized under applicable law to consent on behalf of a prospective subject to the subject's participation in the procedure(s) involved in the research. If there is no applicable law addressing this issue, legally authorized representative means an individual recognized by institutional policy as acceptable for providing consent in the nonresearch context on behalf of the prospective subject to the subject’s participation in the procedure(s) involved in the research." (45 CFR 46.102(i)).
View the Research Involving Persons with Impaired Consent Capacity (NIU IRB policy) for the NIU institutional policy on who may provide consent for persons with impaired consent capacity.
In addition to the “key information” section at the beginning of the informed consent, the following basic elements of informed consent are required to be provided in the course of the consent process:
When appropriate, the following additional elements of informed consent must also be adequately provided to the participant or LAR:
Researchers who wish to store or maintain identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens which were collected either for research studies or for nonresearch purposes have the option of using broad consent to obtain permission from the subjects or their LARs to store or maintain the identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens. This includes the storage or maintenance of audiotapes or videotapes.
If the subject or LAR is asked to provide broad consent, the following shall be provided to each subject or the subject’s LAR:
The following basic elements of broad consent are required to be provided in the course of the broad consent process:
The IRB may waive the requirement for the investigator to obtain a signed consent form for some or all of the participants if it finds and documents the following:
In research projects where the IRB has waived the signature of informed consent, the investigator(s) must still provide all of the required elements of informed consent to the participants, and the IRB may require the investigator(s) provide participants with a written copy of the consent information to be given. The IRB will review a written description of the information that will be provided to the participants to ensure that all of the required elements of informed consent are included.
The IRB may not omit or alter any of the requirements for broad consent. If an individual was asked to provide broad consent for the storage, maintenance, and secondary research use of identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens, and refused to consent, an IRB cannot waive consent for the storage, maintenance, or secondary research use of that identifiable private information or identifiable biospecimens.
With the exception of broad consent, the IRB may approve a consent procedure that omits some, or alters some or all of the elements of informed consent only if the IRB finds and documents that:
The research or demonstration project is to be conducted by or subject to the approval of state or local government officials and is designed to study, evaluate, or otherwise examine:
The research meets the following criteria:
Note: When the FDA regulations apply to a research project, the IRB may not waive or alter the consent process.
An IRB may approve a research proposal in which an investigator will obtain information or biospecimens for the purpose of screening, recruiting, or determining the eligibility of prospective subjects without the informed consent of the prospective subject or the subject’s LAR, if either of the following conditions are met:
This waiver of consent for screening, recruiting, or determining eligibility does not apply to procedures other than oral or written communication or existing private information or identifiable biospecimens. Other types of screening procedures, such as taking blood pressure, blood draws, conducting hearing screenings, using physical sensors, collection of saliva, etc. still require prospective informed consent of the participants.
Studies which will not fully disclose the purpose, nature or other aspects of the study to potential participants at the time of informed consent may be conducted only when the deception is deemed necessary by the IRB for the conduct of the research. Because studies involving deception involve incomplete disclosure of some of the eight basic elements of consent requirements, the IRB must determine that the conditions for waiver of consent described in this policy are met.
Participants in a study involving the use of deception or incomplete disclosure should be provided with information about the nature of the deception and/or incomplete disclosure after the completion of the study unless debriefing is not possible or would cause unacceptable risk to the subjects. During the debriefing, subjects must have the opportunity to ask questions and be given the opportunity to withdraw from the study or have their data removed.
Studies using incomplete disclosure or deception should do so to the minimum extent required for the purposes of the study.
When appropriate, the consent process for studies involving deceiving the participants regarding the nature or purposes of the research may include prospective authorization of the deception.
Where authorization of deception is used, the consent process will inform the participants that they will be unaware of or misled regarding the nature or purposes of the research.
When some or all of the prospective participants do not speak or readily understand English, the participant must be provided information throughout the study in their own language. The informed consent must be a written consent document drafted in language understandable to the participant.
Alternatively, oral presentation of informed consent information may be used with persons who do not speak (or cannot read) English. In such cases, an oral presentation and a short form written document may be provided in a language readily understandable to the participant, and the English language informed consent document approved by the IRB may serve as the basis for the oral presentation.
When using the short form consent:
The IRB must receive and approve prior to their use, all foreign language versions of the short form document and any other translated documents presented to the participants.
The IRB may require the investigator(s) provide additional information in the informed consent other than the required elements if it deems them necessary to protect the rights and wellbeing of the participants.
Projects involving the use of videotaping or audiotaping must make specific mention of this in the consent documents. The subject must have the choice of whether to participate in the video or audiotaping procedures. This consent is separate and distinct from consent to participate in the project; therefore, separate signature and date lines are required. If the IRB has approved a waiver of the written signature of consent, the investigator must ensure that either the written consent information or the oral consent process addresses consent to be recorded separately from consent to participate in the research.
Additional consent requirements for children, pregnant women and fetuses, and prisoners are specified in the separate NIU IRB policies specific for those populations.
Policy Library
815-753-5560
policy-library@niu.edu