|
University
of Utah-Fall Semester, 2003 Wedneday 4:35pm - 7:05pm Room BUC 106
Office Hours: Monday 10:00am-11:30am
Instructor: Lisa Yamagata-Lynch
Office: MBH 139-A
Phone: 587-7980
E-mail: Lisayl@niu.edu
*The University of Utah and the Department of Teaching & Learning seek
to provide equal access to its programs, services, and activities for
people with disabilities. Reasonable prior notice is needed to arrange
accommodations
*Upon discussion with students, the instructor reserves the right to make
revisions to the course syllabus
|
|
Purpose
|
|
The purpose
of this course is for you to develop an understanding of the fundamentals
of research design in education. The course involves the presentation
of basic information about the purposes of research, the scientific method,
experimental-quantitative and nonexperimental-qualitative methods, and
implementation of investigations. Additionally, you will be expected to
become an educated consumer of research reports and become able to conduct
a thorough and meaningful literature review and report it in a professional
manner.
|
|
Objectives
|
|
Develop!
- Your understanding
of educational research design
- Skills
to conduct reviews of educational research reports
- Skills
to prepare a professional quality research reports
- A community
with your classmates as a team of collaborative learners
Reflect!
- On your
understanding of educational research design
- On your
understanding of educational research reports
Share!
- Your understanding
of educational research design
- Your understanding
of educational research reports
Practice!
- Interpreting
educational research reports
- Making
decisions based on your interpretations of educational research reports
|
|
Assignments
|
|
Article
Critiques 30 pts (10 pts X 3) |Article Critique
1 Questions|Article
Critique 2 Questions|Article Critique 3 Questions|
You have to complete 3 article critics. Article critiques are your reflections
on the research design of an article you are assigned. Your critics should
be related to the ongoing discussions that take place in class and the
readings for class. These article critics should not exceed more than
4 pages and double-spaced using 12-point Times New Roman font. Further
details to the article critique will be given in class. The writing and
style of the report should be professionally prepared and follow the APA
manual 5th edition. The deadline for this assignment is at the beginning
of class on: 10/1, 10/29 and 11/12.
Literature
Review Plan 15 pts |View Instruction|View
Rubric|
You
have to conduct a library search in preparation for a literature review
based on a research question you choose. You are not expected to read
each articles you find thoroughly, but expected to read the abstract very
carefully to decide if each article you find is going to be part of your
literature review or not. You have to search for your literature until
you find that your search is saturated. Further details to the literature
review plan will be given in class. The writing and style of the report
should be professionally prepared and follow the APA manual 5th edition.
The deadline of this assignment is at the beginning of class on: 10/8.
Literature
Review Report 40 pts |View
Rubric|
You
have to complete a literature review report based on a research question
you choose. The components of the literature review report is as follows:
- Title
Page
- Review
of the Literature
- Introduction
to the topic
- Review
of Literature
- Final
comments on your research topic based on the literature review
- References
The literature
review should not exceed more than 15 pages double-spaced using 12-point
Times New Roman font. The writing and style of the report should be professionally
prepared and follow the APA manual 5th edition. The deadline of the research
proposal is 5pm on 12/5. Bring your paper to my office at MBH 139-A.
Literature
Review Report Presentation 5 pts |View
Guide|
You
have to present your literature review report to the class. For the presentation
prepare a 1 page handout (times new roman font single-spaced)
This presentation
will take place during the 12/3 class session.
|
|
Course
Expectation
|
|
Class
Participation 10 points
You
are expected to come to class and participate in a manner that provides
evidence that you have read and reflected on the assigned readings and
discussion that take place in class
|
|
Grades
|
|
Assignments
and Total Possible Points
| Assignments
|
Possible
Points
|
| Article
Critiques (10 X 30) |
30
|
| Literature
Review Plan |
15
|
| Literature
Review Report |
40
|
| Literature
Review Report Presentation |
5
|
| Class
Participation |
10
|
| Total
Possible Points |
100pts
|
The definitions
for the letter grades are as follows:
| A |
Outstanding
performance; excellent command of course content. |
A
100-96, A- 95-90 |
| B |
Good,
solid work; Good command of course content. |
B+
89-87, B 86-84, B- 83-80 |
| C |
Meet
minimum requirements; Satisfactory performance; Average command
of course content. |
C+
79-77, C 76-74, C- 73-70 |
| D |
Marginally;
below average command of course content; Minimally acceptable performance.
|
D+
69-67, D 66-64, D- 63-60 |
| F |
Unsatisfactory
performance; Inadequate knowledge of course content. |
59
points or below |
|
|
Required
Texts
|
|
- Creswell,
J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating
quantitative and qualitative research. New Jersey: Pearson Education,
Inc.
- Denzin,
N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and
practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln
(Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Maxcy,
S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in social
sciences: The search for multiple modes of inquiry and the end of the
philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook
of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research (pp. 51-89). Thousand
Oaks: Sage Publications.
- Mitchell,
T. R., & Analee, H. (1999). Poles apart: Reconciling the dichotomies
in education research. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.),
Issues in Education Research: Problems and Possibilities (pp. 42-62).
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- APA
Manual 5th Edition
- Selected
readings for the article critiques
- Article
Critique 1:
Seymour, J. R., & Osana, H. P. (2003). Reciprocal teaching procedures
and principles: Two teachers' developing understanding. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 19(3), 325-344.
- Article
Critique 2: Webb, M. N., Nemer, M. K., & Zuniga, S.
(2002). Short circuits or superconductors? Effects of group composition
on high-achieving students' science assessment performance. American
Educational Research Journal, 39(4), 943-989.
- Article
Critique 3: Timperley, H. S., & Phillips, G. (2003).
Changing and sustaining teachers' expectations through professional
development in literacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19(6),
627-641.
|
|
Schedule
|
|
| Week |
Day |
Topic |
Readings |
Notes |
Assignments |
| 1 |
8/20 |
Introduction |
|
|
|
| 2 |
9/27 |
REVISED:
Educational Research from a Philosophical Perspective |
Denzin
& Lincoln (2000), Maxcy (2003), Mitchell & Haro (1999) |
|
|
| 3 |
9/3 |
REVISED:
Overview of Educational Research |
Creswell
Chp.1 & 2 |
|
|
| 4 |
9/10 |
Identifying
a Research Problem and the Literature Review |
Creswell
Chp. 3 & 4 |
|
|
| 5 |
9/17 |
Preparing
Educational Research Guest Speaker Robert Nelson Library Database
Research at computer lab near Curriculum Library (304B) |
|
|
|
| 6 |
9/24 |
Research
Purpose, Hypothesis, and Question |
Creswell
Chp. 5, Article Critique 1 selection |
|
|
| 7 |
10/1 |
Data
Collection |
Creswell
Chp. 6 & 7
|
|
Article
Critique 1
Seymour & Osana (2003) |
| 8 |
10/8 |
Data
Analysis |
Creswell
Chp. 8 & 9 |
|
|
| 9 |
10/15 |
Reporting
Educational Research |
Creswell
Chp. 10 |
|
Literature
Review Plan |
| 10 |
10/22 |
Research
Design 1: Experimental, Quasi-Experimental, Correlational Design |
Creswell
Chp. 11 & 12
|
Inferential
Statistices |
|
| 11 |
10/29 |
Research
Design 2: Survey Design |
Creswell
Chp. 13, Article Critique 2 selection |
Survey
Design |
Article
Critique 2
Webb, Nemer, & Zuniga (2002) |
| 12 |
11/5 |
Research
Design 3: Grounded Theory and Ethnographic Design |
Creswell
Chp. 14 & 15
|
Grouded
Theory
Ethnography |
|
| 13 |
11/12 |
Research
Design 4: Narrative Research |
Creswell
Chp. 16 Article Critique 3 selection |
Narrative
Research |
Article
Critique 3
Timperley & Phillips (2003) |
| 14 |
11/19 |
Research
Design 5: Mixed Method and Action Research Design |
Creswell
Chp. 17 & 18 |
Mixed
Methods
Action Research |
|
| 15 |
11/26 |
Student
work time |
|
|
|
| 16 |
12/3 |
Literature
Review Report Presentations |
|
|
|
| 17 |
12/5 |
Paper
Due 5pm |
|
|
Literature
Review Report |
|
|
If you have any questions e-mail Lisayl@niu.edu
|