Phase I - FY09-FY11

Outcomes - Presidential Task Force on Core User Facilities

Core User Facilities

Goals

Strategies

Activities

Outcomes

Individuals Impacted

Original

  • promote the sustainability of existing major scientific research facilities by ensuring that they have optimum support staff, maintenance and upkeep, and replacement cycles
  • develop a coherent university strategy for creating new facilities, or engaging in major renovations of existing facilities

Revised

Address:

  • Pressing unmet
  • campus needs with respect to research facilities, equipment, services and personnel and/or specific needs
  • for investment in existing facilities, equipment, services and personnel;
  • Succession planning for key support personnel;
  • Institutional barriers to establishing, maintaining and sustaining common equipment/core user facilities and services;
  • Lack of clarity regarding allowable and appropriate methods of cost accounting for core user facilities and services;
  • Improving web sites associated with common equipment/core user facilities and services.
  • ensure that teaching laboratories in STEM disciplines were adequately maintained and updated

 

Development of:

  • A basic template or business model for operating research facilities;
  • A university strategy for targeting construction and replacement of major research facilities; New funding models to enable users to access the facilities.
  • The costing firm of Kennedy and Associates has been hired to conduct analysis 5 core user facilities (3 service units, 1 laboratory, and 1 major equipment) and develop guidance for use in migrating these and future facilities to a core user model;
  • Relocated the unused anechoic chamber from physics, where it is tying up usable lab space, to CEET, where it can be used by researchers in CEET and CHHS;
  • Developing a Core Methods Service to provide statistical, methodological, and other technical support on research grants, proposals, and publications
  • Colleges developed plans for targeted use of the strategic planning funds, and identified the courses and students that would benefit from the improved facilities.
  • Increases in: efficiency in utilization of research facilities/services;
  • Productivity in experimental sciences;
  • Grant support for facility/service use; use of university facilities by external clients;
  • Compliance with federal cost accounting principles and lower risk of audit findings;
  • Efficiency in space allocations for experimental sciences
  • Funding of improvements in teaching labs in CHHS, CLAS, CEET

Students

  • Upgraded labes used by 3486 students