Northern Illinois University

Spring 2009 

POLS 412
Constitutional Law III

Civil Liberties:

The First Amendment, Second Amendment,

and the Right to Privacy

            This course focuses on three areas of constitutional interpretation. Through a review of various U.S. Supreme Court cases and related material, we will examine the concepts of religious liberty, freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms, and privacy. In each area, we will also study the Court as a political institution, paying particular attention to the larger political contexts in which decisions are made as well as voting behavior of the justices. Can Supreme Court justices be classified as “liberal” or “conservative?”  If so, how does this affect their interpretation of the constitution?

T TH 3:30 - 4:45  DU 461

Instructor: Artemus Ward                   
Office: 410 Zulauf Hall
Office Phone: 815-753-7041
E-mail: aeward@niu.edu
Website: http://polisci.niu.edu/polisci/faculty/ward/
Office Hours: T 2:00pm-3:30pm; 5pm-6:30pm & by appointment


 

Learning Objectives

1. To think critically about the American form of government, the role of the constitution, and the U.S. Supreme Court.
2. To gain experience and knowledge by thinking critically about and participating in supreme court decision-making exercises.
3. To gain knowledge of the process and politics of constitutional decision-making.


 

Required Text

Lee Epstein and Thomas Walker. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Rights, Liberties & Justice, 6th ed. (Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press, 2007).


Course Requirements

Mid-Term Exam

The mid-term will be an on-line, objective test consisting of both true-false and multiple choice questions. The material covered will be the cases listed on the syllabus up to the mid-term exam date. The test will be available on Blackboard for a 24-hour period. You may take the test at any time during that window. Once you begin the exam, you will have 30 minutes to answer 25 questions. Each question is worth 4 points each for a total of 100 points.

Moot Court and Paper

Participation in the Supreme Court decision-making exercise and paper - all students are required to participate in the exercise acting as a Supreme Court Justice. Failure to attend a conference day will result in a reduction of one full grade on your overall paper grade. No exceptions. Each student is required to write one 5-6 pp. paper written in the form of an opinion (either majority, concurring, or dissenting) on one moot court case. IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT YOU FOLLOW THE SUGGESTIONS ON THE “PAPER TIPS” DOCUMENT located in the “course documents” section of Blackboard.

Extra Credit

You may write additional opinions for extra credit. One quality 2-3-page paper that covers 1/3 of the required opinions is worth 1/3 a grade boost on your main paper grade. A quality 4-page paper that covers 2/3 of the required opinions is worth 2/3 a grade boost on your main paper grade. A quality 5-6-page paper that covers all of the required opinions is worth 1 full grade boost on your main paper grade. The maximum amount of extra credit you can gain is one full grade boost—that means one 5-6 page paper, or one 2-3 page paper and one 4 page paper, or three 2-3 page papers. See the course documents section for further details.

Final Exam

The final exam is the same format as the midterm but will only include the course material covered AFTER the midterm exam.

Graduate Students

Students taking the course for graduate credit ONLY have to complete a 15-20pp. research paper. Graduate students have no other course requirements. Of course it is understood that at the graduate level you will do all of the assigned readings, attend every class, and consistently participate in class discussions and the moot courts. There are several options for the required paper. You may expand the required undergraduate paper using additional cases, law review and other journal articles, and books. You may also do another type of research paper that is related to the course material such as an annotated bibliography, research proposal for a Master’s Thesis or Doctoral Dissertation, or other type of original research. See me as early in the semester as possible to discuss your choice. Graduate students do not need to write the 5-6 pp. paper required of all undergraduates nor take the final exam, unless of course you want to for fun! Your grade will be based 70% on your paper and 30% on participation.


Grading System

Final grades will be determined by the following scale:

Grade

Percent

General Grading Definition

A

90-100

Excellent

B

80-89

Very Good

C

70-79

Average

D

60-69

Below Average

F

0-59

Failure

Grade Breakdown:

Requirement

% of Total Grade

Mid-Term Exam

30%

5-6 Page Moot Court Paper

40%

Final Exam

30%

Total=

100%


Course Policies

1. Extracurricular Activities - It is your responsibility to notify me in advance of any activities that will disrupt your attendance. If your activities make it impossible for you to attend classes each week, you should consider withdrawing from the course. Material is covered in class that cannot be found in the course readings.

2. Late Work - Anything turned in late will be marked down one-third grade for every day it is overdue. Exceptions are made only in the most extraordinary circumstances and I will require some sort of documentation to make any accommodation.

3. Cheating and Plagiarism - PLAGIARISM, SIMPLY DEFINED, IS TAKING SOMEONE ELSE'S WORDS OR IDEAS AND REPRESENTING THEM AS BEING YOUR OWN. It is specifically prohibited by University regulations, which state:

Good academic work must be based on honesty. The attempt of any student to present as his or her own work that which he or she has not produced is regarded by the faculty and administration as a serious offense. Students are considered to have cheated if they copy the work of another during an examination or turn in a paper or an assignment written, in whole or in part, by someone else. Students are guilty of plagiarism, intentional or not, if they copy material from books, magazines, or other sources without identifying and acknowledging those sources or if they paraphrase ideas from such sources without acknowledging them. Students guilty of, or assisting others in, either cheating or plagiarism on an assignment, quiz, or examination may receive a grade of F for the course involved and may be suspended or dismissed from the university. (Undergraduate Catalog)

4. Statement Concerning Students with Disabilities - Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, NIU is committed to making reasonable accommodations for persons with documented disabilities. Those students with disabilities that may have some impact on their coursework and for which they may require accommodations should notify the Center for Access-Ability Resources (CAAR) on the fourth floor of the Health Services Building (753-1303). CAAR will assist students in making appropriate accommodations with course instructors. It is important that CAAR and instructors be informed of any disability-related needs during the first two weeks of the semester.

5. Undergraduate Writing Awards - The Department of Political Science will recognize, on an annual basis, outstanding undergraduate papers written in conjunction with 300-400 level political science courses or directed studies. Authors do not have to be political science majors or have a particular class standing. Winners are expected to attend the Department's spring graduation ceremony where they will receive a certificate and $50.00. Papers, which can be submitted by students or faculty, must be supplied in triplicate to a department secretary by the end of February. All copies should have two cover pages - one with the student's name and one without the student's name. Only papers written in the previous calendar can be considered for the award. However, papers completed in the current spring semester are eligible for the following year's competition even if the student has graduated.

6. Department of Political Science Web Site - Undergraduates are strongly encouraged to consult the Department of Political Science web site on a regular basis. This up-to-date, central source of information will assist students in contacting faculty and staff, reviewing course requirements and syllabi, exploring graduate study, researching career options, tracking department events, and accessing important details related to undergraduate programs and activities. To reach the site, go to http://polisci.niu.edu


Course Calendar

INCORPORATION

Week 1 Course Introduction & Incorporation
T Jan 13 Introduction, syllabus review, how to brief a case, using Blackboard: see http://www.helpdesk.niu.edu/its/helpdesk/blackboard_support.shtml
TH Jan 15 Barron v. Baltimore (1833) and Hurtado v. California (1884) (Optional Background Information – Epstein & Walker introductory material; The U.S. Constitution located in the back of the book).


RELIGION

Week 2 Incorporation & Free Exercise I
T Jan 20 Palko v. Connecticut (1937) and Duncan v. Louisiana (1968).
TH Jan 22 Free Exercise Foundations: Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940) and Sherbert v. Verner (1963).


Week 3 Free Exercise II
T Jan 27 Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972) and Employment Division v. Smith “The Peyote Case” (1990).
TH Jan 29 City of Boerne v. Flores (1997) and Gonzales v. O Centro Espitita Beneficente Uniao Do Vegital (2006) (on-line only: abridged, full).


Week 4 Establishment: Foundations & Aid to Religious Schools
T Feb 3 Foundations: Everson v. Board of Education (1947) and Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971).
TH Feb 5 Aid to Religious Schools: Agostini v. Felton (1997) and Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002).


Week 5 Establishment: School Prayer I
T Feb 10 The Warren Court: Engel v. Vitale (1962) (on-line only: abridged, full) and School District of Abington Township v. Schempp (1963).
TH Feb 12
From the Burger Court to the Rehnquist Court: Wallace v. Jaffree (1985) (on-line only: abridged; full) and Edwards v. Aguillard (1987).


Week 6 Establishment: School Prayer II and Government Endorsement of Religion I
T Feb 17 
The Rehnquist Court: and Lee v. Weisman (1992) and Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000) (on-line only: abridged; full).
TH Feb 19
Lynch v. Donnelly (1984) (on-line only: abridged, full) and County of Allegheny v. ACLU (1989) (on-line only: abridged, full—Blackmun & Kennedy only).


Week 7 Establishment: Government Endorsement of Religion II
T Feb 24 Capitol Square Review Board v. Pinette (1995) (on-line only: full—Scalia & Stevens only) and
Locke v. Davey (2004) (on-line only: abridged; full—Rehnquist & Scalia only).
TH Feb 26 The Ten Commandments Cases: McCreary County v. ACLU
(2005) (on-line only; abridged, full) and Van Orden v. Perry (2005).


Week 8 Conference Day II and Midterm Exam
T Mar 3
CONFERENCE DAY I - Justices meet to deliberate and vote on cases.
TH Mar 5 The Midterm Exam will be available for a 24-hour period.


Week 9 Spring Break


Week 10
T Mar 17 No Class.

TH Mar 19 No Class.


SPEECH

Week 11 Speech in Times of Crisis & Regulating Expression I
T Mar 24 Schenck v. United States (1919), Abrams v. United States (1919) and Gitlow v.
New York  (1925).
TH Mar 26 Dennis v. United States (1951), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969), and United States v. O'Brien (1968).


Week 12 Regulating Expression II
T Mar 31
Symbolic Speech: Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), Texas v. Johnson (1989).
TH Apr 2
NO CLASS: Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Palmer House Hilton, Chicago.


Week 13 Expression III
T Apr 7 Fighting Words: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) and Cohen v. California (1971).
TH Apr 9 Protests:
Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston (1995) (on-line only: abridged; full) and Hill v. Colorado (2000). Final opinions from Conference I due today. 

 


 

Week 14 Expression IV
T Apr 14 Obscenity:
Roth v. United States (1957) and Miller v. California (1973).
TH Apr 16
CONFERENCE DAY II - Justices meet to deliberate and vote on cases.


PRIVACY

 

Week 15 Privacy
T Apr 21 Reproductive Freedom:
Griswold v. Connecticut (1965) and Roe v. Wade (1973).

TH Apr 23 Abortion & Intimacy: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) and Lawrence v. Texas (2003).


Week 16 The Right to Bear Arms & Course Conclusion
T Apr 28 The 2nd Amendment:
United States v. Miller (1939) and District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) (on-line only: abridged, fullScalia and Stevens only).
TH Apr 30
Course Conclusion: Awards Ceremony, Trivia Contest, “Ask the Professor Anything...” Final opinions from Conference II and all extra credit opinions due today.  


Week 17 Final Exam will be available on TH May 7.