UNIVERSITY
ASSESSMENT PANEL
Notes from Meeting of
5 March 2010
The seventh meeting of the University Assessment
Panel (UAP) was held on Friday, 5 March 2010, at 10:00 a.m. in Altgeld 203.
Announcements
The UAP’s
next meeting is the Assessment Expo, to be held in the Sky Room at Holmes
Student Center on the morning of March 19. Registration and continental
breakfast begin at 8:30 a.m. UAP members and other university personnel are
encouraged to participate, even if they cannot attend the entire session.
Status Report from University
Libraries
The assessment plan and status
report for the University Libraries was discussed. Patrick Dawson, Dean of the University
Libraries, was present to answer questions about the report and the assessment
practices at the libraries. Currently, there are no reported quantitative
results or assessment rubrics in the report. It was agreed that when the action
tasks from the libraries’ strategic planning effort are available, Carolinda Douglass will meet with representatives of the
library to help construct rubrics with assessable outcomes and to develop a
feasible assessment plan.
Status Report from Students’
Legal Assistance
Donald Henderson, the Director
of Students’ Legal Assistance, was on hand to provide a history of the legal
assistance program at NIU and to offer perspectives on the assessment tools in
use by this student unit. The office provides general information on legal
matters to student groups and also takes on 800 to 1,200 individual cases
involving students per year. Ideas were solicited to improve the response rate
from client surveys. The report in general was commended for its clear goals,
measurements, and use of results.
First Year Composition
(FYC) Report
This is the second year
in which student essays have been evaluated at the beginning of English 103 and
then compared with the same students’ work at the end of English 104. The
measure that is consistently weakest is that of presentation, which involves
grammar, punctuation, and usage. It was noted that presentation skills are not
valued equally across disciplines or courses and that writing is not integrated
into every course equally. In order to help faculty assess student writing in
the same way that is done for the FYC evaluation, it was suggested that someone
from the Department of English be invited to discuss the rubric and to present
both good and bad writing samples.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned
at 11:30 a.m. The Assessment Expo will be held on the next UAP meeting date,
which is 19 March. The next regular UAP meeting is scheduled for 5 April 2010
at 10:00 a.m. in Altgeld 203.
U\Assessment\UAP\2009-2010\Notes\Notes
3-5-10.doc